Why NADCAP Exists When the Shop Already Holds AS9100
AS9100 certifies a supplier's overall quality system, but it does not audit the technical specifics of how a particular special process is run. NADCAP fills that gap. Administered by the Performance Review Institute on behalf of the aerospace primes themselves, NADCAP sends auditors with deep technical expertise in one process family to examine pyrometry, process parameters, operator qualification, and conformance to the specific specifications a process must meet. A heat-treat NADCAP audit, for instance, scrutinizes furnace surveys, thermocouple calibration, and temperature-uniformity testing in detail no general quality auditor performs.
For a Youngstown buyer, the practical meaning is that NADCAP accreditation gives you specification-level confidence in the one operation that most often determines whether a part performs or fails. The valley's heat-treating and welding heritage is exactly the kind of capability that benefits from this scrutiny — decades of metallurgical know-how, now documented and audited to aerospace-consensus standards.
The key insight is that NADCAP and AS9100 are complementary, not redundant. A complete aerospace part may pass through an AS9100 machine shop and a NADCAP-accredited heat-treater, each credential covering a different layer of the work.
Reading a NADCAP Accreditation Scope Correctly
The single biggest mistake buyers make is treating NADCAP as a single, all-purpose credential. It is not. NADCAP accreditations are granted by process commodity — Heat Treating, Welding, Nondestructive Testing, Chemical Processing, Materials Testing, and others — and within each commodity the accreditation is scoped to specific processes and even specific specifications. A Youngstown supplier accredited for heat-treating is not automatically accredited for welding, and a heat-treater accredited for one specification may not be accredited for the one your print calls out.
Verify the accreditation in eAuditNet, the Performance Review Institute's database, which lists accredited suppliers and their exact scopes. Pull up the supplier and confirm the commodity, the specific processes, and the specifications on your drawing all fall within their listed accreditation. A scope that's close but not exact is a gap you must close before awarding, usually by confirming directly with the supplier and your customer.
Also check the accreditation status and merit status. NADCAP suppliers earn longer audit intervals through strong audit performance, and an accreditation in good standing with extended merit signals a mature, well-run process. A supplier whose accreditation is suspended or whose scope has narrowed is a finding worth investigating before you commit a flight-critical part to them.
What Travels With a NADCAP-Processed Part
When a part comes back from a NADCAP-accredited special-process supplier, the records are part of the conformance evidence. For heat-treat, expect the furnace chart or recipe, the load identification, hardness or mechanical-property results where required, and a certification referencing the exact specification and revision the process was run to. For welding, expect the welding procedure specification, welder qualification records, and any required inspection results. For NDT, expect the inspection report, the technique used, and the certification level of the inspector.
These records tie back to the specification your engineering called out, and they're what an aerospace prime will demand if a question ever reaches the part. The certification should reference the NADCAP-accredited facility and the applicable process specification by number and revision — a generic certificate of conformance that doesn't name the specification is insufficient for special-process work.
Flow these documentation requirements explicitly to the special-process supplier, ideally through the AS9100 machine shop that controls the routing. In aerospace special processes, the part and its records are inseparable; a perfectly heat-treated part with missing pyrometry documentation can still be rejected because the evidence chain is broken.