🔩 ALUMINUM
CNC Milling of Aluminum: Grades, Speeds, and Tolerances That Hold
Aluminum is the workhorse of the milling floor, and for good reason: it cuts fast, chips clear easily, and most general-purpose shops can hold tight tolerances on it without exotic tooling. The differences that matter to a buyer live in the grade and temper, where 6061-T6, 7075-T73, 2024, and 5052 each behave differently under the tool and after machining.
ISO 9001AS9100ITAR
Why Aluminum Mills So Well, and Where It Bites Back
Aluminum's low cutting force and high thermal conductivity let modern machining centers run surface speeds of 1,000-3,000 SFM and chip loads that would destroy a tool in steel. With sharp uncoated or ZrN-coated carbide and proper coolant or air blast, material removal rates on a 40-taper machine routinely exceed 30 cubic inches per minute in 6061. That speed is the whole economic argument for aluminum: the spindle time per part is a fraction of what the same geometry costs in stainless.
The trade-off is that aluminum is gummy. Wrought alloys with high silicon or magnesium content load up cutting edges and build up on the flutes if speeds drop or coolant fails, smearing the finish and dragging dimensions. Built-up edge is the number-one finish killer in aluminum milling, and it shows up worst at low RPM with dull tooling. The fix is the opposite of intuition for steel machinists: go faster, keep the edge sharp, and flush the chips aggressively. Polished-flute or high-helix end mills designed specifically for aluminum make a visible difference on wall finish.
Picking Between 6061, 7075, 2024, and 5052
6061-T6 is the default for a reason. It machines cleanly, welds and anodizes well, and at roughly 95 on the machinability scale it gives an excellent balance of strength (around 45 ksi tensile, 40 ksi yield) and cost. Choose it for brackets, housings, fixtures, and anything that needs anodizing without surprises.
7075-T73 trades weldability and cost for strength, landing near 73 ksi tensile in the T6 condition; the T73 over-aged temper sacrifices some of that strength to gain stress-corrosion-cracking resistance, which is why airframe structure specifies it. It machines slightly harder than 6061 and can leave a marginally rougher finish, but it holds tight tolerances and is the go-to for structural aerospace parts. 2024 is the fatigue-and-strength alloy of choice for aircraft skins and fittings, but its copper content hurts corrosion resistance and it does not anodize attractively, so it is usually clad or painted. 5052 is the formability and marine-corrosion alloy; it is rarely milled in volume because it is soft and gummy, but it shows up for milled plate parts that also need bending or salt-water service.
Tolerances, Finish, and Distortion Realities
On a well-maintained VMC, aluminum holds +/-0.001 in routinely and +/-0.0005 in or tighter on critical features with temperature control and a finishing pass. Bore and flatness work in the tenths range is achievable but starts to demand a climate-controlled shop because aluminum's coefficient of thermal expansion (about 13 microinch/in/F) means a 70 F to 90 F swing moves a 10-inch part by several thousandths.
Surface finish of 32 Ra microinch is easy with a finishing pass; 16 Ra and below is reachable with a fly cutter, polished tooling, and the right feed. The real risk on thin-wall and plate parts is distortion from residual stress. Plate stock, especially in 7075 and 2024, carries internal stress from rolling and quenching; when you mill away one face, the part bows. Buyers ordering thin precision parts should expect the shop to rough, stress-relieve or let parts rest, then finish, and should budget for the extra setup. Stress-relieved plate (e.g., 6061-T651) exists specifically to reduce this and is worth specifying for flatness-critical work.
What Drives Cost and Lead Time
For most aluminum milling, material is cheap relative to machine time, so geometry and setup count dominate the quote. A simple 6061 bracket from billet might run $15-$40 in moderate quantity; a multi-axis aerospace part in 7075 with tight tolerances and several setups can run hundreds. 7075 and 2024 plate cost noticeably more than 6061 per pound, and certified aerospace stock with mill test reports adds both cost and lead time because of traceability paperwork.
Lead times for standard aluminum milling run 1-2 weeks at most job shops, often faster than steel because cycle times are short and tooling is rarely the bottleneck. Secondary operations move the needle most: hard anodize (Type III) adds 3-7 days and a real cost, clear or color Type II anodize is cheaper and faster, and chromate conversion (Alodine) per MIL-DTL-5541 is common for aerospace electrical-ground surfaces. Tight-tolerance parts that need stress relief and a rest cycle stretch lead time regardless of how fast the spindle runs.
Frequently Asked Questions
6061-T6 is almost always the cheapest aluminum to mill. It is the most widely stocked alloy, so material cost is low, and at roughly 95 on the machinability scale it cuts fast with minimal tool wear, keeping spindle time short. Expect a simple 6061 part to cost less than the same part in 7075 or 2024 by 15-40 percent, driven mostly by raw material price rather than machining difficulty. 7075-T73 and 2024 plate cost more per pound and, when aerospace-certified with full mill test report traceability, can add another premium plus a few days of lead time for documentation. 5052 is inexpensive as raw material but rarely a cost win because its gummy softness slows finishing and risks poor surface quality. If your part does not need 7075's strength or 5052's formability, specifying 6061-T6 is the single easiest way to reduce a milled aluminum quote.
On a standard CNC vertical machining center, a competent shop holds +/-0.005 in as a default no-cost tolerance and +/-0.001 in on most controlled features without special effort. Pushing to +/-0.0005 in or into the tenths (0.0001-0.0003 in) is achievable on bores, flatness, and critical dimensions but requires a finishing pass, sharp dedicated tooling, and ideally a temperature-controlled shop. Aluminum's thermal expansion is high, roughly 13 microinch per inch per degree F, so on parts longer than a few inches the shop floor temperature directly affects whether tenths hold. For flatness-critical thin plates, distortion from residual stress in the raw stock matters more than the machine's capability, which is why stress-relieved tempers like 6061-T651 are specified. Be realistic: ask for tight tolerances only on the features that need them, since blanket tight tolerancing inflates inspection time and cost across the whole part.
The usual culprit is built-up edge, where aluminum welds itself to the cutting tool and then tears away, leaving a dull, smeared, or torn finish. It is worst with dull tooling, low spindle speeds, inadequate coolant or air blast, and the gummier alloys like 5052 and 6061 in soft tempers. The counterintuitive fix versus steel is to run faster, not slower: high surface speed, sharp polished-flute carbide made for aluminum, high helix angles for shearing action, and aggressive chip evacuation. A flood of coolant or a strong air-mist blast keeps chips from re-cutting and carries heat away. For a true mirror or sub-16 Ra finish, shops use a fly cutter or single-point finishing pass with fine feed. If finish is critical, specify the Ra value on the drawing; a 32 Ra microinch finish is essentially free, but anything below 16 Ra adds setup time and cost.
Yes, and anodizing is one of the main reasons buyers pick aluminum. 6061 and 5052 anodize cleanly and take both clear/color Type II and hard Type III coatings with predictable, attractive results, which is why consumer and aerospace housings favor 6061. 7075 anodizes acceptably but can come out slightly less uniform in color due to its alloying. 2024 is the problem child: its high copper content makes it anodize poorly and unevenly, so it is usually chromate-converted (Alodine per MIL-DTL-5541) or painted instead. Plan for anodizing's dimensional effect: Type II adds roughly 0.0002-0.0005 in per surface and Type III hard anodize adds about 0.001-0.002 in per surface, half of which grows outward, so machined dimensions on coated features must account for the buildup. Lead time for anodizing typically adds 3-7 business days. If color matching across a batch matters, tell the shop up front so they keep parts from one heat lot together.
Standard aluminum milling typically ships in 1-2 weeks from a domestic job shop, and aluminum is usually faster than steel or stainless because cycle times are short and tooling rarely limits throughput. Simple parts in stocked 6061 can move faster, sometimes 3-5 days, if the shop has machine availability. The factors that extend lead time are material and finishing rather than machining: aerospace-certified 7075 or 2024 plate with mill test report traceability can add a few days of sourcing, and any secondary operation pushes the schedule. Anodizing adds 3-7 days, chromate conversion a few days, and outside heat treat or stress relief adds a turnaround cycle plus shipping to and from the processor. Flatness-critical thin parts that need a rough-then-rest-then-finish sequence also take longer regardless of spindle speed. For tight schedules, ask the shop which finishes can be done in-house and whether your grade is in stock before committing to a date.
Last updated: July 2026
Find Aluminum Milling Suppliers
Search verified shops that handle Aluminum milling.
No logins. No email gates. Just results.